Ladies in Waiting Part Deux

Since I found so much interesting info (interesting to me, anyway!) on the lives of Georgian ladies-in-waiting, I decided to do a Part Two this week, continuing from last Monday.

The Countess of Harcourt became a Lady of the Bedchamber to Queen Charlotte in 1784, and she also became one of the Queen’s few friends, staying with her until her (Charlotte’s) death in 1818. Lady H. recalled one occasion when she said to the Queen, “I should like to tell YOU something, but pray promise never to let the QUEEN know it.” The Queen laughed and answered, “Oh, no, SHE can have no business with what passes between us in our private unreserved conversation.” But these lighthearted moments were an exception in what was considered a very dull Court indeed.

The Queen would receive at Court only women of unblemished reputation, “proscribing from her society all females of bankrupt or even ambiguous character” (Anne Somerset, from “Ladies in Waiting”). I don’t think ladies of, shall we say, a more risky disposition could care too much about this exclusion. The Court was no longer a center of fashion, as it had once been, since the values espoused by the King and Queen were so far from those set by the leaders of fashion.

The Court was also bound by rigid, uncomfortable etiquette. Fanny Burney, the novelist and sometime lady-in-waiting, wrote after first visiting Court, “In the first place you must not cough…In the second place you must not sneeze. In the third place, you must not, upon any account, stir either hand or foot. If, by chance, a black pin runs into your head, you must not take it out. If the pain is very great you must be sure to bear it without wincing; if it brings the tears into your eyes, you must not wipe them off…”

Other rules include one forbidding anyone to initiate a conversation with the King or Queen, or to eat in their presence. Ladies could not leave the Queen’s presence of their own accord, and when they did leave they had to back smoothly out of the room (with a train!). No one could sit in the Queen’s presence, even if faint or pregnant.

Of course, their duties could have been worse. The Ladies of the Bedchamber didn’t have to wait on the Queen at meals or assist with her toilette, aside from ceremonial; duties such as fastening her necklace. There were six of these ladies, drawn from the highest reaches of Society, each on call for two months of the year, usually only for formal occasions. The more day-to-day duties were now divided between the two Keepers of the Robes and their assistants, the wardrobe women (a whole ‘nother article, I think!). Ladies of the Bedchamber were paid 500 pounds a year (rather unfairly, the hardworking Keepers got only 200, but they did have free accomadations). Though the King and Queen were always eager to reduce their domestic budget, the Queen, despite a reputation for parsimony, would never permit savings at the expense of her ladies. She even fought the Government’s efforts to reorganize financial arrangements in 1812, condemning their proposed cuts as “shabby.”

Now, last week I asked if YOU would make a good lady-in-waiting. This week I wonder would your own heroine (or the heroine of your favorite books) do well at Court? Or would they be too rebellious? 🙂

About Amanda McCabe/Laurel McKee

Writer (as Amanda McCabe, Laurel McKee, Amanda Carmack), history geek, yoga enthusiast, pet owner!
This entry was posted in Regency, Research and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Ladies in Waiting Part Deux

  1. Cara King says:

    None of my heroines would do well, I’m afraid. They’re human beings like me — they cough or sneeze sometimes, and more than one of them fidgets on occasion.

    Cara

  2. Elena Greene says:

    Interesting question, Amanda!

    My first thought is my heroines would do as I would–behave perfectly until they completely cracked, either taking their own lives or running off with a footman (so much for hiring ladies of impeccable character).

    OTOH I could probably write a funny heroine who sneezed at inconvenient moments (allergic to royal pets or something). Or in a more serious story, one who behaved with outward perfection because she was there as a spy or bodyguard or something.

    Fun!

    Elena

  3. My heroine would be too skeered to screw up, so she’d be good, but unhappy. Until she met the hero, whereupon she would go punch someone.

    Yay for her!

  4. Todd says:

    I would be a terrible lady-in-waiting–those Court dresses just aren’t flattering on me.

    But what I’ve always wanted to know is, what were the ladies-in-waiting waiting for? For a bus? For a phone call? Do they also serve who only stand and wait?

    Todd-who-can’t-wait-for-an-answer

  5. jane perkins says:

    One of my ancestors, Caroline Liardet, was a Lady in Waiting to Queen Charlotte.

Comments are closed.