Jane Austen

Meet Marsha Altman

Today we welcome Marsha Altman, whose book The Darcys and the Bingleys: A Tale of Two Gentlemen’s Marriages to Two Most Devoted Sisters was released this month.

Marsha, big congrats on the book and thanks for coming to visit today! Marsha is offering a signed copy of the book to a lucky winner–your comment or question enters you in the drawing.

We’ve seen a lot of Austen sequels lately. What makes yours stand out?

Every author has their niche, the story they want to tell within the niche of Pride and Prejudice sequels. Some people want to speculate on the sex lives of the married Darcys – all well and good of it’s done well – some want to focus on marrying off the remaining cast, and one person writes cozy mysteries. I value uniqueness very much, which is why I’m attracted to the stories that haven’t been told yet. Georgiana’s gotten married in numerous sequels, Elizabeth and Darcy have a great marriage life but the kid is slow in coming – I wanted to do something about the Bingleys, and about the friendship of Darcy and Bingley.

Also my book has some fight scenes. I like swords. Also guns, wooden legs of chairs, candlesticks – whatever works.

How did you come to write this book?

It started as a short story meant to be between Darcy and Bingley about their pre-wedding jitters and expanded from there. Some people take offense to the idea that Darcy would be experienced upon entering his marriage, which is historically improbable (he is roughly 29 when he marries, depending on when his birthday occurs, which is never mentioned in the book). But Bingley, who’s more sweet and innocent, could be a virgin. So he goes to his best pal for awkward advice. I found the notion amusing. Everything that came after that was just more ideas I had. I told myself I would stop writing when I ran out of things to do with the characters or they died, and I haven’t had it in me to kill any of them yet.

How did you feel about taking on Jane Austen?

I think I could take her. I’m probably taller than her, and I have martial arts experience. On the other hand she was a good dancer and got plenty of exercise, and we’re both pretty sickly, so it might be an even match. I wouldn’t underestimate her.

Now for the serious answer, in terms of “taking on” the length and breadth of her work by attempting to continue it, I don’t worry about it because it simply can’t be done. I’m not one of the foremost novelists in the British language and I wouldn’t be even if I changed my citizenship. I’m trying to have fun with her characters. As to whether she would mine, Miss Austen has posthumously endured her nephew and extended family publishing all of her unfinished writing and personal letters for profit, numerous sequels and adaptations, books analyzing her personal life, and even movies about her starring actresses wearing heavy lipstick. So, if she’s been spinning in her grave, she’s probably tired by now and may well have gotten over it. That or she understands imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, if that phrase existed in the Regency period.

What sort of research did you do, and did you discover anything 

I’m a historian by nature. It was my undergraduate degree and I almost went for a PhD in it but got fed up with graduate academia. Therefore I had some initial trouble navigating the Regency fiction waters. This a culture you’re far more familiar with than I am, as I’ve not read much Regency romance outside of Jane Austen and Austen fanfic, but the world as it is portrayed in Regency fiction and Regency romance in conventional, modern publishing seems to be a world contrived from actual history and some assumptions about history based on writers from the period, Austen being the main one. Some people don’t realize that Jane Austen wrote contemporary fiction; I’m writing historical fiction. They’re two different things. I can’t write the story I think she would have written. I can only write a story set in that period of history using characters that resemble hers. I decided to rely on historical accuracy over Regency writing traditions. While certainly not true of everything (especially “Risky” Regencies!), the Regency period is presented in fiction as this very sanitized, rule-bound world. This is the world Jane Austen wrote about. It doesn’t mean it was the world that actually existed during the Regency period.

Roger Sales wrote a very interesting book, Jane Austen and Representations of Regency England. In the 1995 edition he included a postscript about the BBC adaptation and what was altered to match people’s perceptions of what the Regency period was over what it actually was. Earlier in the book, he comments that when Jane Austen’s letters were first published, it was during the Victorian period, and they were edited. Not that there was anything scandalous in there, but references to mundane things like bedbugs and illness were removed for a Victorian audience, that wanted to see Jane Austen in the sanitized world of her fiction.

To do the things I really wanted to do in the story, especially the later half where there’s more drama and violence, I decided to take a more historical route, which means people getting shot and having gruesome surgeries and some people dying. I saw no reason to focus on the mechanics of sex – plenty of more competent romance writers have done that – but I didn’t feel a need to leave out some of the other un-polite parts of Polite Society. It was too limiting to do otherwise. The characters still act appropriately (most of the time), but they encounter the gritty parts of their world whether they like it or not. It’s not very “Austen-esque” but it was a decision on my part and I’ve stuck with it ever since.

You tell the story of two characters who aren’t wholly sympathetic– 
Bingley himself and his sister Caroline. How did your perceptions of 
them change?

First off, Bingley. Despite the fact that he was inspired by Simon Wood’s portrayal of him in the 2005 movie, where his lines were a bit dumber than the lines given to the BBC Bingley (Crispin Bonham-Carter), I had to give Bingley some intelligence, just not in the realm of social intercourse.

Bingley is a foil to Darcy. He’s comfortable in social situations but not a great wit; Darcy is uncomfortable before strangers but always has something intelligent to say. They make a great pair in terms of dialogue, and you could see how one would rely on the other for their perceived deficiencies. Eventually it becomes a very brotherly rivalry, and Bingley actually bests Darcy a few times, though largely at things beyond his control. His father was a brilliant businessman, so I gave Bingley a head for numbers and languages, which plays a bigger role in future books. But he remains lovable and affectionate Bingley, which is key to the Caroline story.

I wanted to work with Miss Bingley because it’s territory very few people have done and I don’t think in any published work. There’s a few scattered fanfics I can name, but mostly in sequels she’s either not there, still scheming, or outright psychotic. While all of Austen’s writing on her would lend itself to that, it was more challenging to do the opposite. Besides, why would she pursue Darcy after he married? She’s too calculating for that. What would she do with her time? She makes some bad decisions, but Bingley is good enough to know she’s in trouble and Darcy is good enough to know he should help. Portraying the Bingley siblings affectionately, after they’ve lived their whole lives together even after the marriage of the eldest sister, has been something I’ve enjoyed doing. I want to make people love these characters. I want to give them a chance to be redeemed.

How did your perceptions of Elizabeth and Darcy change? Are they 
still the ultimate, perfectly matched couple?

It’s a difficult act to make Darcy and Elizabeth partners in every sense of the word without betraying their essential characters. Elizabeth is too self-assured, Darcy is too distant and uneven. Their love transcends it, and they learn the lessons of Pride and Prejudice and don’t repeat them, but upon their marriage they have to learn to lean on each other when both are used to being very independent. I had no interest in writing a story where they fight for any extended period of time, but there are still subtle battles for dominance and understanding in the relationship. Most of it is expressed quickly or unexpressed but still present. In a marriage, as two couples move towards each other physically and emotionally, it’s a bit like a battle even if it isn’t one – there are advances and there are concessions, however minor, that cause the forming of a stable and lasting relationship. The foundation is there but it still takes work to build on it, and even when caught up in other plotlines, Darcy and Elizabeth are still working towards the ultimate companionship a true marriage can bring.

What’s next for you?

Several books in this series. They get increasingly dramatic – there are only so may wedding one-liners you can do – but I hope to maintain the undercurrent of humor to ease the burden of the challenges the characters face. There’s more on the Darcy family history that takes awhile to be fully revealed, the other characters get a bit caught up in some of the political things going on around them without being political themselves, and of course there’s kids. Lots of kids. I really need a good genealogy chart.

Also I write sci-fi, so I’ll probably get back to that when I’m done with the series.

How do you intend to end the series?

They all get eaten by dinosaurs.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Diane Gaston
14 years ago

What a clever idea, Marsha! This book sounds delightful. Thanks for visiting us here at the Riskies and giving us the scoop on your book and the world of P&P sequels.

Louisa Cornell
14 years ago

“They all get eaten by dinosaurs.” LOL Hey, I’ve read worse endings! I’ve WRITTEN worse endings!

I love your concept, Marsha. Stories of the very real human dynamic between friends are some of my favorites. I have often thought people choose their friends very much in the way they choose a spouse. Not all of their friends, but more often than not, we all have that one friend to whom we are close who is very much like our spouse or fills in the gaps in our personality.

How interesting that they edited Jane Austen’s letters to take out the very real mundane details. Those are the things I love to read. (Not necessarily bedbugs, but you know what I mean.)

I am really looking forward to reading your historical perspective on the times, the social experience and some of the realities that we sometimes gloss over in the name of romance.

On the other hand, there are some things I’d really rather not encounter when I am reading a romance – especially if they are put in there strictly for shock value. I’ve read a few historical romances like that.

A well-crafted historical romance, with great characters, great insight into what makes them tick, historical accuracy, and a presentation of growing love and the struggle with the human condition – these are the things that appeal to me. It is a tough line to walk.

From the sound of your concept, I think you have nailed it. Can’t wait to see!!

That said, how do you decide which historically correct information to use, and which to leave out? And how do you arrive at the why of leaving something out?

Gwynlyn MacKenzie
14 years ago

Very interesting interview promising a very interesting read.

I look forward to examining the dynamics between the evolving characters. (Also nice to know I’m not the only one that thinks writing historically accurate fiction doesn’t preclude writing Sci-fi!)

14 years ago

This was a great interview. I really enjoy reading interviews with authors because I learn a little about them. This book sounds like a great read!

Marsha Altman
14 years ago

That said, how do you decide which historically correct information to use, and which to leave out? And how do you arrive at the why of leaving something out?

I don’t go into huge descriptions of why something is something (as opposed to our conventional notions). Like if someone makes a reference to an obscure Regency piece of literature, I would have to explain it, so I either do it in one line or choose literature that they would have had but also is popular known today. To make references to things that no longer exist (like Angelo’s fencing hall or cant) and not give the reader a history lesson is a very subtle art in historical fiction. I think James Clavell is the best at it (author of Shogun).

Amanda McCabe
14 years ago

“Stories of the very real human dynamic between friends are some of my favorites.”

I agree–some of my favorite books have dealt with the relationships of families and friendships as well as romantic love! They are so endlessly varied and fascinating.

And thanks so much for being here, today, Marsha!! This book sounds very intriguing. 🙂

14 years ago

Hi on this Sunday! 🙂 I loved the sound of this book when I happened on it online, and just hope to pick it up soon! 🙂 And that’s one of the things I know I like, and I imagine many people do too, is the friendship between Darcy and Bingley. . . we tend to focus on first and foremost Lizzie and Darcy, but there’s also plenty of other relationships going on, and to see any more of those, is always a good thing! 🙂


Eliza Knight
14 years ago

Fabulous interbeiew and the book/series sounds amazing! Can’t wait to read it!


Marsha Altman
14 years ago

Wow, I have to say, Janet really went out of her way with the pictures there. Thank you!

Susan Wilbanks
14 years ago

This book sounds fascinating–can’t wait to read it. I love less-than-sanitized takes on the Regency! Also, you’ve confused me to move Jane Austen and Representations of Regency England up on my library holds list.

Marsha Altman
14 years ago


It is a really good book. Very academic, so it is a little dry at times, but his analysis of the BBC miniseries is really interesting. He knows some stuff I’ve never read anywhere else, like that they specifically signed the breeches on the second shoot for the officers, and that though the rest of the cast couldn’t wear makeup for authenticity other than cover-up, Colin Firth had mascara on. Apparently his face wasn’t “dark” enough to be Darcy.

Louisa Cornell
14 years ago

I’m with you, Susan. I have moved the book up on my list of BOOKS I HAVE TO BUY!! I love research books that give me those neat little obscure facts.

That said, Marsha what are you favorite research books on the Regency?

You are so right about sliding history in without it sounding like a history lesson. It is definitely a subtle art. SIGH, I’m still working on that!

Janet Mullany
14 years ago

Colin Firth with mascara? Amazing.

Thanks for a great interview, Marsha. How many years will the series cover until the untimely demise by dinosaurs, and will you get onto a second generation of Bingleys and Darcys?

Also I don’t object too much (well, not a lot) to the sanitization of Austen–what I do object to is reducing her to simpering niceness when I suspect she was really quite a snarky sort of person.

14 years ago

Hi Marsha. Great interview. Your book sounds good.

Marsha Altman
14 years ago

That said, Marsha what are you favorite research books on the Regency?

“What Jane Austen Ate and Charles Dickens Knew” is deceptively helpful. I’ve been told by a lot of people information in there is not correct, but it’s so well organized, you can’t help but look up things in it and hope it’s right.

“Georgette Heyer’s Regency World” was good, but not great, as I hadn’t read a lot of her books beforehand and it references them constantly.

“The Agent of Elegance” by Arthur Byrant had some really fascinating chapters about Regency life when he wasn’t talking about Napoleon’s campaign.

Ben Wilson’s “Descency and Disorder” was a nice find when I was book shopping in England.

“The Regency Companion” (Sharon Laudermilk) is considered to be the ultimate classic for research, but it’s VERY expensive. I went to the library and photocopied the whole book.

The most fun I think was “Beau Brummell” by Ian Kelly, just because it was so well-written.

And there’s another 100 or so books lying around, but most of them are specific things, or start with the words “Age of.”

Marsha Altman
14 years ago

How many years will the series cover until the untimely demise by dinosaurs, and will you get onto a second generation of Bingleys and Darcys?

Also I don’t object too much (well, not a lot) to the sanitization of Austen–what I do object to is reducing her to simpering niceness when I suspect she was really quite a snarky sort of person.

If her letters are any indication, she probably was. On the other hand, people write when they’re emotional, so who knows? No one.

There are discussion about Sourcebooks wanting to publish books 2 and 3. There are ten in the series, almost all of them written. So it goes until … well, the original characters die. Of old age. While in the clutches of a dinasaur jaw. It’s a combination death.

Louisa Cornell
14 years ago

Wow! Ten books almost all written! I feel like such a slacker!! I never thought about photocopying the whole book of The Regency Companion. I would really love to have all of that information. Perhaps if I sell a book I will buy my own copy. I have the Arthur Bryant books and they are really good.

Yes, old people simply don’t do well when stressed out by dinosaur jaws!

14 years ago

Hi Marsha! Wonderful interview! I love the Regency period. Your book sounds fascinating. I can’t wait to read it!

14 years ago

Great interview, Marsha. I am a recent convert to Jane Austen sequels. I was a bit of a snob until I won a box of them from somewehere. Your series will be one that I am going to follow. Ten books and everyone getting eaten by dinosaurs is very hard to resist, lol.

Good luck and I’ll be looking for your books on the shelves.

Cara King
14 years ago

Thanks for visiting, Marsha!

And I agree — though there’ve been a lot of Austen sequels over the years, there are so many characters just begging for their stories to be told!


14 years ago

“They all get eaten by dinoaurs.”

Ha! what an excellent response,much better than “I don’t know yet” or “They do X, Y, Z” which readers will likely have forgotten by the time the book actually rolls around.

(my antispam word is gtbmpz – get bumps. how about that for an ending??)

Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join millions of other followers
Powered By WPFruits.com
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x