Back to Top

Category: Jane Austen

I hope everyone enjoyed Christmas. Having had to drive 350 miles through the snow to visit family and dreading the same for the return trip today (I didn’t order this weather!) I’m looking forward to celebrating New Year’s at home.

It’s been a long standing tradition for us to make a special dinner, trying at least one new recipe. This year the new recipes are Chicken Kiev (accompanied by potato puffs and green beans almondine) and chocolate peanut butter pie for dessert. Then we’ll settle in to watch movies. This year it’ll be the Sherlock Holmes movies with Robert Downey Jr.

mrdarcyelizabethMy daughters have delighted me by agreeing to a Jane Austen movie marathon on New Year’s Day. So far we’ve agreed on the Colin Firth/Jennifer Ehle Pride & Prejudice. We’re still discussing which other films we can fit in. I’m thinking the recent Northanger Abbey with Felicity Jones and JJ Feild (whose name is so much fun to write, breaking that “i before e” rule). Maybe Sense & Sensibility, but which one? Maybe the girls would enjoy seeing Professor Snape as a romantic hero.

We’re still thinking about food. Should we go period or would that make things too complicated? The point of this day is to relax. I’m away from my period recipe books so will have to check later today if there’s something easy I can make.

Any suggestions about films and food for our Jane Austen movie marathon? How are you all planning to celebrate the New Year?

Elena
www.elenagreene.com

I’m closing out Jane Austen’s birthday week by offering copies of the Cozy Classics board book editions of Pride and Prejudice and Emma, along with my novella A Dream Defiant in your choice of electronic format. Comment by 9 PM Pacific Standard Time on Sunday (that’s midnight Eastern) for a chance to win!

Emma image

I have a humiliating confession to make:

The first time I read Jane Austen, I got about a chapter in and then quit.

I was 14 or so, and I’d taken to reading my hometown library’s extensive collection of Georgette Heyer, Clare Darcy, and Marion Chesney. They were real, adult love stories I didn’t have to hide from my mom. Which wasn’t the case with historical romance in general. Anything with the lurid “bodice ripper” covers so prevalent in the 1980’s wasn’t quite forbidden to me, but they led to lectures on appropriate entertainment, the importance of waiting till marriage to have sex, etc. I occasionally snuck such books into the house regardless, but for the most part I just found ways to read what I liked that flew under Mom’s radar–e.g. you’d never guess how much sex is in the Earth’s Children series by the covers.

But I digress. Our librarian noticed me working my way through Heyer, Darcy, and Chesney and said I really MUST try this book called Pride and Prejudice.

So I checked it out, took it home, and tried to read it. But I couldn’t quite follow what was going on somehow, and the arch wit of the writing completely went over my earnest, angsty young head. So I gave up and set it aside.

I didn’t try Austen again until just after college, when I was 23 or 24. Again I started with Pride and Prejudice–and this time it instantly clicked. I plowed through all six of her novels one after the other, and I’ve re-read them more times than I can count in the years since.

P&P illustration

I’m still baffled and not a little embarrassed by my adolescent self’s failure to Get It. It’s not like I was a poor reader–I loved Jane Eyre, and I read Romeo and Juliet for fun at 12, albeit an annotated version with footnotes clarifying all the language and references I didn’t yet have the maturity and experience to pick up on my own. Maybe I would’ve done better with an annotated Austen to explain the entail, the relative social positions of the Bennetts, Darcys, and Bingleys, and everything else that baffled me then but made perfect sense a decade later.

Or maybe I just wasn’t for anything that wry and subtle. Those Regencies I was plowing through were by far the least angsty and dramatic fiction I was reading at the time, and even Heyer isn’t quite in the same league as Austen for subtlety, IMHO.

What about you? How old were you when you got your first taste of Austen, and did you immediately connect to her stories? Do you have a favorite book by any author that didn’t work the first time you read it?

One of the most agonizing experiences of a writer’s life is pitching to an editor or agent. In five minutes–or less–you must prove–coherently–what your book is about and how it’s  the next best thing. Most writers find it difficult to talk about something that may have obsessed them for months or years, and Austen rarely talked about her writing to anyone except close family. Here’s my tribute to Jane Austen and the chance to win a prize: a set of postcards featuring the beautiful Jane Austen stamp designs from 2013 (a collector’s item!), and I’m throwing in a $10 Amazon Gift Certificate:ASjanelarge

Editor: Hi Jane, take your time. What do you have for me?

Jane: It’s a Regency-set romance about two sisters whose family has fallen on hard times and they—

Editor: So they become courtesans to save the family? Are there dukes in it?

Jane: No. The younger sister falls in love with a rake but he has to leave her to fight a duel because–

Editor: Is that before or after they’ve had sex?

Jane: They don’t ever have sex, because he’s had sex with another girl and–

Editor: Oh, so she’s the heroine.

Jane: No, she’s the ward of Colonel Brandon, who’s in love with the youngest sister—

Editor: Oh great, readers love a damaged military hero.

Jane: He’s actually in quite good shape for his age, but—

Editor: How does the other sister play into it? It seems you have quite a few characters already.

Jane: She’s in love with a clergyman.

Editor: A clergyman! So he’s dying to get her into bed? That’s really sexy.

Jane: Not so you’d notice.

Editor: OK, send me a partial. What else do you have?

Jane: My next book is about five sisters.

Editor: A series?

Jane: No.

Editor: Then why are there five? Do you need them all?

Jane: Well, yes. Lizzie, the eldest, meets a gentleman, Darcy, at an assembly—

Editor: Would our readers know what that is? Is it a sex club?

Jane: It’s a dance. But–

Editor: Is he a duke?

Jane: No. But he has ten thousand a year.

Editor: Is that as much as a duke makes?

Jane: More or less. But the hero Darcy is too proud to dance with Lizzie and then his friend falls in love with her sister and Darcy opposes the match—

Editor: He’s jealous? Great, a m/m element. How graphic do you get?

Jane: They talk about money a lot.

Editor: OK, send me a partial. Anything else?

Jane: I have a book, Mansfield Park, which—

Editor: Is that the hero’s name?

Jane: No his name is Edmund. He’s the cousin of the heroine Fanny.

Editor: Her cousin? Sorry, we don’t publish that sort of book.

Jane: Oh dear. I have a romantic comedy that is also a gothic.

Editor: Are there dukes?

Jane: No.

Editor: Anything else?

Jane: My book Emma is about a woman who dominates her community.

Editor: BDSM?

Jane: No, Highbury.

Editor: Anything else?

Jane: My book Persuasion is about a second chance at love.

Editor: We see rather a lot of those. What’s your hook? Does your heroine or hero have agonizing emotional baggage, for instance?

Jane: She has trouble with her complexion, according to her father.

Editor: Is she a courtesan? I think the market is a little over-saturated but readers love them.

Jane: No, not really. The hero is a sailor.

Editor: Interesting. You could rewrite it as a contemporary and make him a Navy Seal.

Jane: I’ve just started a comedy about invalids.

Editor: I don’t think our readers would go for that. Unless they’re dukes who are soldiers who’ve been emotionally damaged by war. (Waving at someone across the room) Oh great, it’s lunchtime.  Thanks, Jane.

a Rafflecopter giveaway

Follow
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join millions of other followers
Powered By WPFruits.com