Back to Top

The Fly in the Ointment

A week ago, I asked everyone what they would most enjoy if they were magically transported back to the Regency, and had tons of money and clout to ease the way.

This week, I’d like to ask the opposite question: What would you least enjoy about your new Regency life? What one thing would be most likely to stop you from going back and living a luxurious Regency life?


Would it be the antiquated medical care?

The non-existent rights that women (and many others) had?

Would you miss “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” “Harry Potter,” or “Lord of the Rings” too much?


Would you not be able to live without pizza, Thai food, or Godiva chocolate?

Would it be the lack of music by the Beatles, Tchaikovsky, Nirvana, George Gershwin, or Scott Joplin?

Would it be the poor heating? Or the poor plumbing?

The lack of free public libraries?

What would be the fly in the ointment of your Regency fantasy?

Cara
Cara King, www.caraking.com
MY LADY GAMESTER — out now from Signet Regency!!!

And the winners are…

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

It is I, Bertram St. James, here to thank you all for attending our party and dazzling us all with your wit and beauty! The patronesses and I can only hope you enjoyed yourselves at least half as much as we did.

And now it is my honour to announce the winners of the Treasure Hunt and daily prizes.

(The exquisite arrangement of my cravat deserves an award of its own, don’t you think? But as one of the hosts I am, sadly, ineligible for a prize. Sometimes beauty must be its own reward.)

Monday’s winner, to receive a copy of DEDICATION, by Janet Mullany:
Amanda (not McCabe!)

Tuesday’s winner, to receive a copy of MY LADY GAMESTER, by Cara King:
Moonlight Maiden


Wednesday’s winner, to receive a copy of LADY DEARING’S MASQUERADE, by Elena Greene:
Alyssa

Thursday’s winner, to receive a copy of THE STAR OF INDIA, by Amanda McCabe:
Amanda (not McCabe!)


Friday’s winner, to receive a copy of A SINGULAR LADY, by Megan Frampton:
Pam P (aka Lady Pamela)

Saturday’s winner, to receive a copy of LORD RYBURN’S APPRENTICE, by Laurie Bishop:
Carolyn

And the winner of the Grand Prize (autographed copies of books by all the Risky Regencies and more):

Sanjay

In addition, I myself would like to give a Surprise Award (don’t you love surprises?) which will consist of one of the patronesses’ backlist titles. So with no further ado, I hereby announce that the “Most Exceedingly Congenial Guest Award” goes to:

 

Kim W (aka Lady Kimberly)

Winners, please do us the kindness of sending an email to elailah@yahoo.com. Please provide your name and mailing address so the patronesses can send you your prizes.

We thank you all for coming, and hope you will visit us often!

Bertie and the Risky Regencies

Janet Mullany
www.janetmullany.com

Cara King
www.caraking.com

Elena Greene
www.elenagreene.com

Amanda McCabe
ammandamccabe.tripod.net


Megan Frampton
www.meganframpton.com

Laurie Bishop
www.lauriebishop.com

Interview with Laurie Bishop, author of LORD RYBURN’S APPRENTICE!

As a child growing up on a dairy farm, Laurie Bishop spent countless hours reading anything she could find—from Greek, Roman, and Norse myths to Robert Frost’s poetry. Then she picked up her grandmother’s copy of Jane Austen’s PRIDE AND PREJUDICE, which began her love affair with the Regency period. Laurie won the Romance Writers of America’s Golden Heart competition for THE BEST LAID PLANS. Today Laurie lives in her native upstate New York. She has a master’s degree in human services and counseling and is employed in social work, but her favorite job is collaborating at night with her marvelous cat and writing partner, Tojo. Learn more at www.lauriebishop.com


Praise for LORD RYBURN’S APPRENTICE!

“Bishop builds the story nicely as Alex’s heart of ice begins to melt and Cora learns what the pangs of love mean. With an unruly cast, tension throughout and some surprising twists, this novel is a perfect fit for Regency lovers.” — Romantic Times Bookclub 4 Stars

“For a sweet and charming regency that combines all the elements of your favorite fairy-tale and your favorite Jane Austen, look no further than Lord Ryburn’s Apprentice.” — Valarie Pelissero, for Rakehell Reviews Read the review

“Laurie Bishop continues to please with her lighthearted romances, engaging characters, and puzzles to untangle…” —Jane Bowers, for Romance Reviews Today Read the review

The Interview

Q. How did you think of writing this particular book? Did it start with a character, a setting, or some other element?

It started with a character. The character was an elderly gentlewoman, childless, who felt unfulfilled and bored–until she hit upon the idea of taking in a ward. The rest of the story came from this.

Q. How long did it take? Was this an easy or difficult book to write?

The book was a challenge to write as I had a limited window of time for completion. Fortunately, once I had developed the characters, the story came with little difficulty. Well, there was a little brain cudgeling! And the research, of course.

Q. Tell me more about your characters. What or who inspired them?

The elderly woman was Lady Estcott. I suppose I was thinking of Miss Havisham in Great Expectations, only lady Estcott was not, at least initially, motivated by revenge–and her enemy was not the entire male sex! I will leave it for the reader to discover the rest.

The heroine, Miss Marland, was more difficult as I chose to make her an innocent young woman with a modest disposition. The challenge was in making her an interesting individual in her own right. She became a person of high intelligence, with an aptitude for music and a strong sense of honor and duty, who evolves from wanting only to better her own position to being motivated to protect those she loves. Lord Ryburn, experienced, dutiful and yet proud, is into a gentleman who, although having a reputation with the ladies, is motivated to protect his eccentric family. Both hero and heroine developed pretty much equally from story demands and the evolution of their characters.

Q. Did you run across anything new and unusual while researching this book?

In this story I paid a lot of attention to London life, and it is important to me to have the details I use be correct. I researched the map of London of the period, period drawings of famous locations as Hyde Park, Park Street and Almack’s (both outside and in). I read a portion of a Victorian diary narrating the details of the writer’s come-out at Almacks. Overall, I searched for the ways in which the middle classes and the upper classes contrasted. I found it interesting how the different London parks were used–the different characteristics, who frequented them, which ones were exclusive, and when.

Q. What do you think is the greatest creative risk you’ve taken in this book?
How do you feel about it?

That would be the characters. As I mentioned before, Miss Marland was a challenge to me. I do think she came out quite well! And I also needed to make Lord Ryburn sympathetic, given his motivation to protect his Great Aunt and the rest of his family from the possible repercussions of Miss Marland’s introduction to the family.

Q. What are you working on now?

At the moment I am deviating from the Regency genre and writing a romantic suspense! No, I do not plan to stay away from the Regency period in the future, but this is a story I have been wanting to tell for a long time.

I have ideas for future Regencies that I want to write, so I will be looking forward to them, and the opportunity to bring them to Regency fans. We shall see what the future holds! Thank you so much to everyone who is a fan of the Regency genre and helps to keep this short time in history alive. I am quite sure that we always shall.

How Risky Would You Be?


Comment on today’s post for the chance to win a copy of Laurie Bishop’s January release, LORD RYBURN’S APPRENTICE. Comments may be posted to the end of today, Saturday, January 14th!

Whoa…here we are, near the end! I’ve been wracking my brain trying to think of something half as intelligent as the other ladies, and I finally decided that, since we are about “Risky Regencies” after all, I should do something with Risky Characters.

It is almost expected that the characters of a traditional regency should be genteel—respectable if not of nobility. (Yes—I already hear the disagreement, but I’m speaking in general, not of the notable and exciting exceptions). Okey-doke. Let’s do this….

Here are some ideas for some Regency characters that would not typically make your average hero or heroine.

During the Regency, the poor were moving from the country to town largely due to the effect of enclosure, the law that gave ownership of the land to a few and therefore ended the common ownership of land by a community. With no land for sustenance farming, the city seemed the best place to survive. Of course, the conditions of the poor in the city were very bad indeed, BUT there were things you could do to make a living.

If you were at all educated with acceptable personal appearance, habits, and ambition, you might become a maid or manservant in a good household. These jobs were difficult, but there were much, much worse things you could do. Other jobs were as shop assistants, trade apprentices, street sellers, street sweepers, and joining the navy (voluntarily or otherwise). There were seamstresses who worked for long hours in poor conditions, rat catchers (who killed rats bare-handed, or sold them at the local pub for use in a rat-pit—to be the prey of ferocious dogs, for entertainment), and scavengers.

Still worse was the use of children in a variety of trades—children sold into trade as orphans or by their parents—and some of the uses children were put to could be very unsavory indeed. There were, of course, the chimney sweeps, which everyone has heard of. There were also children who were put into prostitution or to work as pickpockets.

Of course, many adults turned to illegal means to survive, of which prostitution and thievery were only two. I mentioned grave-robbing in an earlier post, for instance. Gambling was epidemic—men, and sometimes women, would bet on anything, even their own lives. And there was an assortment of scams—rather like an early version of the Internet.

One scam I can think of was one where a woman of ill repute teamed up with a male partner or two and would seduce a gentleman into coming to her chamber. Likely he was drunk, but be as it may, he would be assaulted, handily dispatched, and when he came to he would discover all of his possessions and his clothing gone.

Then there were characters who would live the life of a gentleman, charming their way through life with empty pockets, living on loans and outrunning their creditors, sometimes getting lucky at a gaming table and sometimes spending time in prison, sometimes seducing a daughter of some man of moderate fortune, and counting on luck to see them through.

We must not forget the high-class courtesans, of course…and some of them lived, and survived, very well—but many did not continue in good circumstances as age took its toll.

Let me get to the point of this monologue…a question. If you could chose your character from any walk of life except that of a well born someone…who would that character, male or female, be? Do you have any idea how your character might escape his or her position? It would be very difficult, but we have the means to find a way for our characters!

Alternate question: If you had to be one of these persons, who would you be? Or, who might you have been in a previous life?

Pick your poison…er, your question!

Laurie
LORD RYBURN’S APPRENTICE
Signet January 2006

P.S. You can still comment on earlier posts until the end of today, to win books by other Riskies. And don’t forget to enter the Treasure Hunt!

Conversion Kit


Risky Regencies Blog Party! Comment on this post to get the chance to win a copy of Megan Frampton’s A Singular Lady. And don’t forget to enter the Treasure Hunt, too!

It’s a question that comes up over and over again on romance reader message boards, at booksignings, anywhere romance readers are likely to get into discussion: If you could choose just one book for a non-romance reader to read, which one would it be?

So I pose the question to you, only more specifically: If you could pick just one Regency romance to give to an interested, non-romance reading friend, which one would it be? And why?

Would it be Pride & Prejudice by Jane Austen? Do you think Austen is ‘cheating’ since it’s a literary classic? Or would you dig out The Grand Sophy by Georgette Heyer from your keeper pile?
Perhaps you’d press a copy of Flowers From The Storm by Laura Kinsale into her hands (preferably the new un-Fabio edition). Or maybe you’d withdraw a Carla Kelly from the rare book vault, maybe Reforming Lord Ragsdale (my favorite) or Mrs. Drew Plays Her Hand, but only if your friend handed over some stocks or the deed to her house to make sure she’d return them.

Since I’m writing this, and don’t have to choose just one, I’d pick either Mary Balogh’s The Notorious Rake or Loretta Chase’s Lord of Scoundrels. Both are filled with passion, incredible, compelling characters, a believable, deep romance and page-turning drama.

So . . . what’s your pick? And why? And have you ever done it, and with what success?

Thanks for playing!

Megan
www.meganframpton.com

P.S. Don’t forget you can still comment on any of the previous posts this week to win books by other Risky Regencies. Also, be sure to enter the Treasure Hunt for the Grand Prize!

Follow
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join millions of other followers
Powered By WPFruits.com