Back to Top

Tag Archives: Jane Austen

(n) Gothic romance (a romance that deals with desolate and mysterious and grotesque events) — from the Princeton University website

My introduction to Gothic romance was in high school, where I first read Jane Eyre and got sucked in by all the classic Gothic romance elements: a romantic but dangerous setting, an innocent and vulnerable heroine, a hero with Secrets. Later (having gone to an all-girl Catholic school) I also read Rebecca, a more modern Gothic that fascinated me and many of my classmates.

I suspect a lot of Gothic romance authors have been inspired by Jane Eyre, but Charlotte Bronte was by no means the founder of the genre. During the Regency, readers enjoyed Gothic romances such as those published by the Minerva Press. It was Ann Radcliffe who made them popular with examples like The Mysteries of Udolpho, which inspired much of the foolish behavior of Catherine, the heroine of Northanger Abbey. Although Jane Austen poked fun at Gothics, I suspect she enjoyed reading some of them herself. BTW I find this cover for Northanger Abbey very funny!

Gothics can go awry. I think the concept of the TSTL (Too Stupid to Live) heroine arose with romances in which the heroine runs off in her nightie, holding nothing but a candle, to investigate an eerie sound in the attic or cellar where dire events are suspected to have occurred.

I still like Gothic romance and I happily suspend disbelief to follow the characters into situations that are wildly unlikely in real life. I played with some of these elements in my recent reissue, SAVING LORD VERWOOD. I haven’t read many recent historicals like this (though I’m admittedly way behind in my reading) but dark paranormals provide the same thrill. A well-written romance with Gothic elements is like a piece of luscious chocolate. Who cares if it’s good for you?

Do you enjoy romance with Gothic elements? What are some of your favorites, classic or modern?

I’ll be giving away 5 Kindle or Nook copies of SAVING LORD VERWOOD to commenters chosen at random. If you win, you can also nominate a friend to receive a free copy. Void where prohibited. You must be over 18. No purchase necessary. Post your comment by midnight EST on January 13. I will post an announcement on Saturday, January 14, so please check back to see if you have won.

Elena
www.elenagreene.com
www.facebook.com/ElenaGreene

As far as I can recall, Jane Austen never used the term “rake” in her stories, but it’s my understanding that during her time, it had a different spin than we put on it in modern historical romances. Jane’s villains tend to be what might have been called rakes; their common trait is they take advantage (or try to) of women in the stories. Her heroines always end up with the good guys.

Jane’s bad boys aren’t all equally villainous and I have a little more sympathy for some than others. Actors’ interpretations can bring out nuances, too.

Frank Churchill from Emma is the lightweight, more selfish puppy than dark schemer. I can’t remember enough of other portrayals of Frank Churchill to judge, but here’s Ewan McGregor in the 1996 (Gwyneth Paltrow) version.

At the other extreme, Pride & Prejudice’s Wickham is pretty loathsome. Here are Adrian Lukis and Rupert Friend, from the 1995 and 2005 versions, respectively. I think Lukis’s Wickham is a little too obvious to fool Elizabeth. Friend, on the other hand, has a gaunt look about him that makes him seem more vulnerable and thus more deceptive.

William Elliot from Persuasion is another villain without redeeming qualities, but at least Anne sees through him pretty quickly. Here’s Samuel West, from the 1995 film that is my favorite adaptations. Honestly, I can’t remember other portrayals. I need to watch more Austen movies over the holiday break!

Willoughby (Sense & Sensbility) is more interesting. Dominic Cooper in the new version seemed kind of a toad; I prefer Greg Wise’s portrayal in the 1995 (Emma Thompson) version. He gives the sense that he will regret giving up Marianne for the rest of his life. Though perhaps he deserves his fate, I can’t help feeling a little sorry for him.

I also find Henry Crawford from Mansfield Park intriguing. Although I haven’t yet seem a film version of MP that I liked, here’s Alessandro Nivola in the 1999 version.

Although I find these last two the most well rounded as villains, they’re still not quite the reformable rakes of historical romance, who may get around but don’t treat women as badly.

So what do you think of Jane’s bad boys? Which do you find most interesting? Which actors did the best job with them? What do you think of good guys versus rakes in historical romance?

Comment for the chance to win either the annotated copy of Pride & Prejudice or Persuasion. Our Jane Austen Week winner will be announced on Monday.

And congratulations to the following winners of the Kindle ebook of THE REDWYCK CHARM. Please send your email address, and if you wish, the email address of a friend who might enjoy a copy, to elena @ elenagreene.com (no spaces).

Virginia
Beebs
Bibliophile
Na
Barbara E

Happy holidays!

Elena

www.elenagreene.com
www.facebook.com/ElenaGreene

Yay! Happy Birthday, Jane! You don’t look a day older than 235.

We’ve been celebrating Jane’s birth all week here at the Riskies, and of course she was on my mind as I rode the subway to work this morning. I haven’t read more than snippets of Jane’s books in years, mostly because I reread them obsessively when I was in my teens, so much so I know I have parts memorized, even thirty years later.

Jane showed me a person could have a different personality and still be likeable. Could still have misguided ideas and still be a good person. Could be tolerable, and also desirable.

Those are some pretty important life lessons.

Earlier this week, Amanda discoursed on Austen film interpretations, and I have to admit to secretly loving the Greer Garson/Laurence Olivier version of Pride and Prejudice. That’s mostly because it was my first version (and you never forget your first…), and I’m pretty sure I saw the film before reading the book, so I didn’t comprehend the incongruity with the text. I knew nothing about historically accurate costumes, or the correct age for the characters, or any of that. I only knew he was handsome, and she was feisty, and I admired her for rejecting such a catch.

Thank you, Jane, for showing me that you should reject people–foxy though they are–if they don’t accept you entirely as you are.

Megan

Posted in Jane Austen | Tagged | 8 Replies

Are you bracing yourself for them? Do you write them? Do you enjoy those cheerful missives from obscure relatives?

What do you think Austen’s characters would say?

My dear Wickham has acquitted himself most gallantly in protecting us from crazed weavers; just imagine, they complain of working 18 hours a day yet still find time to roam the streets in a most vulgar way, bemoaning their lot, hurling filth at the regiment’s handsome regimentals, and demanding an extra 2d a day! Talking of which, I regret my dear Wickham has suffered misfortune at the gaming tables once again, and if every member of the family could contribute a little, say 2 guineas, or possibly 5, we could overcome our temporary embarrassment and not bring shame upon the family… Captain and Mrs. George Wickham

Oh I am so happy in the great house and magnificent grounds of Pemberley; I roam for hours exclaiming aloud over my extreme felicity and great good fortune in marrying my dear Mr. Darcy, who naturally is busy with his trout streams and other male pursuits. We are both so well occupied that we meet but little, although I have taken the fortuitous step of drawing the route to the bedchamber in chalk upon the floors so that we may at least meet at night; Mr. Darcy suggested it after I lost my way and had to spend the night in such places as the third minor stillroom and once sharing the housekeeper’s bed. She sang her master’s praises all night long and I scarce got a wink of sleep… Mr. and Mrs. Fitzwilliam Darcy

Ann proves herself a formidable ally against the enemy. Upon boarding our latest prize I was most diverted to find her at my side, her face black with powder and a knife clenched between her teeth, uttering terrible oaths and despatching several terrified Frenchies with violent blows. She demands a share of the prize money and her ration of rum but you will be pleased to learn she occupies herself also with more womanly pursuits such as comforting the wounded. Our ship’s surgeon says she beats any he has seen in the execution of a fast amputation… Captain and Mrs. Frederick Wentworth

In our first year of married bliss dear Mr. Knightley is so agreeable and charming it is quite as it is before which pleases Mr. Woodhouse mightily. Mr. Knightley spends most of the day with us, although he makes haste to return from visits to Donwell Abbey before nightfall, as for Mr. Woodhouse’s peace of mind we now have a dozen armed guards and as many mastiffs patrolling the garden and chicken coop after dark. I believe that Mr. Woodhouse will eventually not need to knock on our bedchamber door enquiring after our health at night; he is easily alarmed by various groans and other sounds that emanate from that room–he is all tender consideration!… Mr. and Mrs. George Knightley

Edmund and I enjoy the most perfect felicity and harmony and delight in counting the twelve toes of our beloved daughter Julia… Reverend and Mrs. Edmund Bertram

Happy birthday, Jane Austen, and sorry for the many liberties I’ve taken for so long… Give us your ideas for snippets of news from Austen characters’ holiday letters.

Why, may you ask, is there a pic of a naked man on this post? God knows why but I see them all over the place. I think it has something to do with writing romance.

As part of our Austen birthday celebrations, we’re delighted to welcome Patrice Sarath, author of The Unexpected Miss Bennett.

“It is a comforting belief among much of society, that a plain girl with a small fortune must have no more interest in matrimony than matrimony has in her.”

The third of five daughters, Miss Mary Bennet is a rather unremarkable girl. With her countenance being somewhere between plain and pretty and in possession of no great accomplishments, few expect the third Bennet daughter to attract a respectable man. But although she is shy and would much prefer to keep her nose stuck in a book, Mary is uncertain she wants to meekly follow the path to spinsterhood set before her…

What an engaging and endearing tale about Mary Bennet! I loved witnessing her gradual transformation, her realization that she can never be something she isn’t, and her newfound understanding of men and relationships. Yes, there is romance in this story! And the hero is just as unexpectedly charming as Mary Bennet!—Austenesque Reviews

Mary Bennet! What appealed to you about her? Austen isn’t very kind to her.

No, Austen was not kind to Mary at all. I don’t think she saw Mary or Kitty as fully fleshed characters. They were more types. Remember that awful scene in P&P where Mary rushes to the piano to show off? I felt so horrible for her even while I understood Lizzy’s embarrassment. But I liked Mary for all that. I saw a book-loving middle sister who wanted attention and was shy and socially awkward. 



I’ve always wondered why Mr. Collins didn’t choose Mary–it’s certainly something that’s been hinted at in movies. Any ideas?

Austen was writing social commentary rather than romance. The reason that Mr. Collins ended up marrying Charlotte is so that Charlotte can exemplify the terrible situation women of Austen’s era found themselves in. If you were very very lucky you married a man for love or at least respect and were well taken care of. But more than likely you had to make a very pragmatic match and you had very few options. And Charlotte looks around pragmatically at her situation and moves in, snaring Mr. Collins to secure herself a position. Charlotte has that great speech about men and women and being sure of one’s potential suitor and Lizzy rejects her argument, but I think in that moment, Austen herself was speaking through Charlotte.

Of course, that just left the field open to me. I decided to write about exactly why Mr. Collins never saw Mary as a potential wife and had a lot of fun with it. 



I’ve always suspected it was because Lady Catherine wouldn’t see Mary as suitable wife material! What made you change genres from fantasy to Austen-related fiction?

I didn’t make a permanent shift. I am still writing fantasy, both with the continuation of my current series and the new projects I’m working on. But I read in all genres and see no reason not to write in all of them. I don’t want to limit myself. 



How do you handle the Austen worldbuilding–any favorite research books or sites?

Oh goodness, Shades of Pemberley is one of the best sites out there. I also visited Jane Austen’s house in Chawton, went to Bath, and read and reread all of her books looking for phrasing, word choices, slice of life vignettes so I could get at what it was like to live back then (Emma is best for this by the way) and things like that. I am not a research hound but I try to know and understand more than ends up in the book. 



I’m an Emma fan too. Which is your favorite Austen?

I knew you would ask that! My favorite is Pride & Prejudice. But Austen’s best book is Persuasion, and there are bits of it that edge out P&P for sheer enjoyment. 



We’re celebrating Austen on and off this month at the Riskies since her birthday falls on 16th. What are you doing to celebrate?

I’m taking part in Austen’s Birthday Soiree, which is being hosted by Maria Grazia of My Jane Austen Book Club. But here’s the funny thing. Even before I wrote The Unexpected Miss Bennet, I’ve always noted Jane Austen’s birthday on the calendar. You know how in January you fill in all the birthdays and anniversaries for the family on the new calendar? Well, Jane Austen, Joan of Arc, John Lennon, and random celebrities have always been written in. So in a way, I’ve always celebrated and lifted a glass to her on the 16th. 



What’s next for you?

The most recent project is underway; it’s a modern fantasy. I’m also editing my third book in my Gordath Wood series, which reboots the series from a different character’s point of view, and her adventures in a fantasy world. Also, I have Kitty’s story yet to tell, but I need to find exactly the right way to get to the truth behind her character, as I did with Mary.

Thank you for the opportunity to visit with you on Risky Regencies.

What do you think of Mary Bennett? Or is there any other minor Austen character whose story you’d like to learn? Your comment or question enters you into a drawing for a copy of the book, so let’s get chatting!

Follow
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join millions of other followers
Powered By WPFruits.com