Back to Top

Category: Jane Austen

greenjaneAs an adjunct blogger, I missed Risky Regencies’ Jane Austen week, but I cannot let another week go by without my own acknowledgement of what Jane Austen has meant in my life.

I have been reading Jane Austen yearly since – well, since before I can remember.  I was delighted when, in the 1980s, the BBC productions of Jane Austen’s novels were brought to us on PBS.  But nothing thrilled me as much as the BBC/A&E production of Pride and Prejudice in 1995.  Along with half the women in the English-speaking world, I fell in love with Colin Firth’s Fitzwilliam Darcy and the adaptation in general.  I had ordered my own videotapes (yes, it was that long ago) before A&E had even completed broadcasting the series.

atlogNot long after that, I began developing The Republic of Pemberley along with Amy Bellinger, who had started a discussion forum just to talk about that 1995 adaptation.  Over the years, Pemberley has grown into a pretty big Jane Austen destination on the web.  We talk about a lot of things besides  Colin Firth these days and have created some interesting Jane Austen-related material.  I’m pretty proud of what we’ve done and would like to share some with you.

Early on, we incorporated the Jane Austen Information Page, an idiosyncratic compilation of Jane Austen facts and criticism, collated and created by Henry Churchyard (an early member of The Republic of Pemberley’s management committee).  Henry has moved on, but Jane Info, remains and I keep threatening to reorganize it one day.

qbackAlso in our early days, we were a big fan fiction hub.  Our Bits of Ivory board drew everything from the initial version of Pamela Aidan’s best-selling Fitzwilliam Darcy, Gentleman trilogy to stories like “Pemberley High.”  Eventually, we decided that fan fiction was not our focus and it made its way to other sites such as The Derbyshire Writers’ Guild (an early spin-off from Pemberley). But we continue to maintain, The Bits of Ivory Archive, a collection of the early fan fiction posted on our site.

As the Republic of Pemberley focused more on Jane Austen, we began developing some interesting additional material.  I’m particularly fond of Jane Austen Locations, a compilation of links to sites in Jane Austen’s life and locations used in adaptations of her work.  Like everything on our site, it’s a work in progress.

Another fun addition to Pemberley is The Jane Austen Gazetteer.  This page is an exhaustive exploration of actual locations used in Jane Austen’s novels.  It uses period maps, guidebooks, and illustrations to provide information that Jane Austen would recognize regarding each location mentioned in her six novels.

There’s more (there’s always more).  We maintain a database of current Jane Austen-related events:  celebrations, meetings, festivals, plays, readings.  This is not exhaustive, although we wish it were.  We do group reads of Jane Austen’s work two or three times a year.  We maintain on-line copies of her work.  We do other stuff.  We celebrate Jane every day.  We’d love to have you celebrate with us.

Posted in Jane Austen | 4 Replies

Rupert-Friend-Wickham

This week, we’re examining what Jane Austen has meant to us–and to say that Austen has informed every aspect of my subsequent reading and writing would not be an overstatement. In fact, Austen’s themes and style is present in my own writing even when I don’t realize it.

My romantic women’s fiction title, Vanity Fare, comes out in less than two weeks (Dec. 26), and some early reviewers are pointing out the similarities to Pride and Prejudice–more similarities than I even realized I had! I knew that I had put in a very Mr. Darcy moment when one of the characters rescues another from a bad financial situation. But there’s more Austen in there, as a review from Book Lovers, Inc. points out:

“In fact, it was clear to see many connections with Pride and Prejudice in the book, from the portrayal of Nick and Simon, to the financial mess Molly’s mother was going through. It was a modern take on the classic, albeit one that could stand on its own merits too.

As much as the story was about Molly finding a way to pay the bills and maybe find love, it was equally about Molly finding herself. Jane Austen’s generation might have tsk’d at the idea of this, but it was very cool to see Molly go from being dependent on her ex-husband to being able to speak for herself and find the strength within to become self-sufficient.”

While this example is both self-serving and timely, my Austen experience covers more than just my latest release. Austen embedded human truths within a deceptively simple read, and each reading, or viewing of the screen interpretations of her work reveals some new facet to the truths.

Thanks, Jane. You rock.

Megan

 

Posted in Jane Austen | Tagged , | 8 Replies

Hi all.  My name is Myretta Robens and I’m going to be sharing Saturday blogging with Megan.  If you don’t know me (and millions don’t), I thought I’d make this post about myself – fascinating topic. 

I met Megan when we both preparing for the publication of our first Traditional Regencies.  Hers was for Signet and mine for Zebra (the last two Trad Regency hold-outs).  We were both writing journals about the road to publication for All About Romance and we just hit it off.  We have since become close friends with an alarming tendency to put each other in our books.  We were also both produced close to the last book in the world of print Traditional Regency.  Mine was Just Say Yes, which was a RITA finalist in 2005.  It lost to Riskies’ own Diane Gaston.  I’m just working my way around to forgiving Diane for this.
 
My first love, however, is Jane Austen, about whom I’m sure you’ll be hearing more from me in the future.  In 1997, a friend and I began The Republic of Pemberley web site.  Admittedly, this site was born of the deep-seated lust provoked by Colin Firth in the role of Fitzwilliam Darcy in the BBC’s 1995 adaptation of Pride & Prejudice.  But it’s grown and changed since then to a rather large and highly interactive Jane Austen site that manages to take up quite a lot of my time.  If you love, Jane, you should visit us.
Have I bored you sufficiently talking about myself?  Would you like to also know that I live near Boston with three cats (11, 11, and 21)?  That I worked for Harvard University until recently and that I still do web design for extra dough?  That I use all these excuses when I’m procrastinating?  That I am writing – really! – currently a Regency-set single title which is about half way there?  My own web site is at myrettarobens.com.  Feel free to visit me there.
I’m happy to be among you and look forward to frisking with the Riskies.  Thanks for inviting me.

Last Saturday one of my favorite events occurred. The Washington Romance Writers meeting when Kathy Gilles Seidel, A WRW member, RITA winner and Austen scholar, speaks about one of Austen’s books and the movies made from it.

This year it was Emma, comparing the book and four movie versions: The Gwyneth Paltrow version, the Kate Beckinsale version, the recent BBC mini-series, and Clueless.

The very first WRW meeting I ever attended (back in 1995), Kathy spoke on Austen’s use of the celebration in her endings. Being so very new to romance writing and still under the influence of the popular disparaging viewpoint of romance being “less than” real books, I was thrilled beyond words to hear this intelligent discussion. Since then I’ve heard Kathy speak several times on Austen and on other romance-writing topics and she never disappoints.

Kathy usually speaks at our January meeting, cancelled this year due to snow and rescheduled to June. We had a smaller group than usual, probably because it was a beautiful day and a busy time of year. It worked out marvelously, though, because the talk became a discussion, casual enough for everyone to feel comfortable speaking up, light enough for plenty of joking and fun.

Here are a few random points made throughout the day-long workshop.

1. Emma is not a romance, but a “woman’s journey”story and essentially a book about power. As a story about power, the movie that comes closest is Clueless.

2. In Clueless the heroine, Cher, is constantly underestimated; in Austen’s book, Emma is constantly overestimated. She is seen as doing no wrong, but, in reality, she gets everything wrong.

3. As a story about power, Austen shows how the power is shifting in the society of her day. The book shows the rising power of the middle class and the decreasing power of the landed gentry. Emma starts the book with lots of social power in her community, but her power is challenged by the Coles, representing the rising middle class, who almost do not invite her to their party, and, towards the end, by Jane Fairfax, who refuses her visit.

3. Within Emma, there are lots of secrets characters keep from each other, but in the book Austen gives subtle hints as to what is really going on. Sometimes the hints are only a few words in a long paragraph. It takes an alert reader and many readings to catch these subtleties. Because of this (and for many other reasons), the book is a classic where you discover new things with each reading.

4. Jennifer Enderlin, editor-in-chief, St. Martin’s Press, and Kathy’s editor, says that, in the first chapter of a book, the writer should give the reader someone to love and someone to hate. But Austen sets herself a great challenge in that she gives the reader many reasons to dislike Emma in the first chapter, and few reasons to like her. The reader must learn to like Emma as the book progresses.

5. We watched clips of the beginnings of the four movies. The moviemakers, though, tried to give viewers clear reasons to like the Emma character. In Clueless, we can forgive Cher her self-centeredness, because she is a teenager. Paltrow’s and Beckinsale’s Emmas are very sweet, especially to their fathers. The BBC version goes back in time and shows Emma’s mother’s death and really pulls on the viewers’ heartstrings.

There was so much more in this stimulating discussion, plus both lunch and dinner with writing friends. What could be better?

What’s your favorite sort of day among like-minded people?
Did you read Emma or see any of the movies? What’s your take?

Don’t forget the Harlequin Historical Authors Summer Beach Bag Giveaway. Today starts week two with plenty more prizes and more chances to win a Kindle Fire!

(n) Gothic romance (a romance that deals with desolate and mysterious and grotesque events) — from the Princeton University website

My introduction to Gothic romance was in high school, where I first read Jane Eyre and got sucked in by all the classic Gothic romance elements: a romantic but dangerous setting, an innocent and vulnerable heroine, a hero with Secrets. Later (having gone to an all-girl Catholic school) I also read Rebecca, a more modern Gothic that fascinated me and many of my classmates.

I suspect a lot of Gothic romance authors have been inspired by Jane Eyre, but Charlotte Bronte was by no means the founder of the genre. During the Regency, readers enjoyed Gothic romances such as those published by the Minerva Press. It was Ann Radcliffe who made them popular with examples like The Mysteries of Udolpho, which inspired much of the foolish behavior of Catherine, the heroine of Northanger Abbey. Although Jane Austen poked fun at Gothics, I suspect she enjoyed reading some of them herself. BTW I find this cover for Northanger Abbey very funny!

Gothics can go awry. I think the concept of the TSTL (Too Stupid to Live) heroine arose with romances in which the heroine runs off in her nightie, holding nothing but a candle, to investigate an eerie sound in the attic or cellar where dire events are suspected to have occurred.

I still like Gothic romance and I happily suspend disbelief to follow the characters into situations that are wildly unlikely in real life. I played with some of these elements in my recent reissue, SAVING LORD VERWOOD. I haven’t read many recent historicals like this (though I’m admittedly way behind in my reading) but dark paranormals provide the same thrill. A well-written romance with Gothic elements is like a piece of luscious chocolate. Who cares if it’s good for you?

Do you enjoy romance with Gothic elements? What are some of your favorites, classic or modern?

I’ll be giving away 5 Kindle or Nook copies of SAVING LORD VERWOOD to commenters chosen at random. If you win, you can also nominate a friend to receive a free copy. Void where prohibited. You must be over 18. No purchase necessary. Post your comment by midnight EST on January 13. I will post an announcement on Saturday, January 14, so please check back to see if you have won.

Elena
www.elenagreene.com
www.facebook.com/ElenaGreene

Follow
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join millions of other followers
Powered By WPFruits.com