Diamonds Are Forever
Do you believe in lucky charms? What’s yours? I have a signed copy of Deborah and Elliot’s story to give away. Just leave a comment for a chance to win.
Do you believe in lucky charms? What’s yours? I have a signed copy of Deborah and Elliot’s story to give away. Just leave a comment for a chance to win.
So, what have I been doing this week? Watching lots and lots of Olympics, certainly. Who knew how interesting the trampoline could be? Who even knew there was a trampoline event at the Olympics?? I’m also loving Kate Cambridge’s colored jeans and cute striped tops. Plus, how hilarious is this Jezebel article about the top ten reason why Ryan Lochte is the world’s sexiest douchebag? Good times….
But I am also trying to finish a new book, a Regency for Harlequin. Wrapping up a story is always the hardest part for me. Beginnings are fun, easy–the book is so shiny and new! The characters haven’t made me mad or veered off on weird pathways yet! Even middles aren’t bad, because I usually know what I’m trying to say about the characters at that point, we’ve gotten to know each other better and I see the shape of the plot clearer. But endings–ugh. For one thing, I always think I am closer to The End than I actually am, and it always takes much longer to get there than I plan. Stuff doesn’t want to get solved, or it gets solved too fast. When I feel frustrated, I turn to my Inspiration Board.
I actually have a cork board hanging on the wall next to my desk, where I stick things like postcards, book covers, scraps of fabric, whatever catches my attention. (Also lots of pics of my 2 year old goddaughter being incredibly cute). But now I’ve also started inspiration boards on Pinterest, to which I am completely addicted. Yes, it’s yet another way to waste time online (like I needed another one of those!), but I also like looking at images that help me get a concrete idea of my book in my mind. Plus there are always pics of cupcakes on there somewhere. (You can follow me there at AmandaMccabe)
So what’s on my Pinterest board for this book?
This is the heroine’s house, called Barton Park in the book. It’s an important part of the story–she moved back there when things went bad in her marriage, to live quietly with her sister and try to make sense out of what went wrong with her husband (and why she still loves him). It has to be once-grand but now sort of shabby…
This is the garden maze, where important plot events happen…
This is the hero, Hayden, who is now sorry for what he did to lose his wife and now has to find a way to get her back…
This is the heroine, Jane, who at first doesn’t want to take him back…
See how fun this can be?? I also have boards for my Mary Queen of Scots book “Tarnished Rose of the Court” and the new Elizabethan mystery series, as well as a Wedding Ideas board.
What would be on your Idea Board? What are you watching on the Olympics??
As you had not heard from me at that time it was very good in you to write, but I shall not be so much your debtor soon. – I want to tell you that I have got my own darling Child from London; — on Wednesday I received one Copy, sent down by Falknor, with three lines from Henry to say that he had given another to Charles & sent a 3d by the Coach to Godmersham; just the two Sets which I was least eager for the disposal of.
Jane Austen to her sister, Cassandra
January 29, 1813
Jane Austen’s “own darling Child” was, of course, the published Copy of Pride & Prejudice. This is month is the 200th anniversary of its publication and a big month for Janeites.
On January 27, 1813 Jane Austen, at Chawton, received her first copy of Pride & Prejudice, sent by her brother Henry from London. Henry also sent copies to Jane’s brothers Edward Austen Knight (in Godmersham) and Charles. Once Jane received her copy, she immediately wrote to Henry and asked him to send c0pies to her brothers Frank and James and, along with her mother, began reading it aloud to a friend without revealing the author.
On January 28, publisher Tomas Egerton’s first advertisement for Pride & Prejudice appeared in the Morning Chronicle, detailing a novel in three volumes with a price of 18s. There were possibly 1500 copies printed; this is not clear. The copyright remained with Egerton until 1841.
Sometime in early February, an anonymous review of Pride & Prejudice appeared in The British Critic, No. 41. No doubt, Jane Austen noted and probably recorded this review. She was assiduous in collecting reviews of her work both public and private.
We will see a lot of events, real and virtual, celebrating this anniversary. Of Jane Austen’s six novels, Pride & Prejudice is, without a doubt, the most beloved. This year, Jane Austen Societies around the globe will be organizing their annual meetings around Pride & Prejudice. Already, books have been published on the topic, festivals are being planned, and the BBC intends to recreate the Netherfield ball. Who can resist?
Will you be celebrating or do you celebrate Pride & Prejudice every year anyway? What are you looking forward to? And what do you think? Is this Jane’s best work?
Happy Tuesday, everyone! Our first order of the day–a winner. Christina Hollis, you are the winner of the guidebook to Kedleston Hall, the inspiration for our Castonbury Park series. Please send us your mailing info at Riskies AT yahoo.com…
The second order of the day–weddings! Again! This weekend I attended the wedding of my oldest friend (we’ve known each other since we were freshmen in high school), and I had a fabulous time. It seems to be weddings all the time around here right now. I have now chosen a dress (the style is a secret for now though, since you never know who might look at his blog…) and a place for the wedding (Santa Fe in December). Now all I have to do is find a moment between working towards TWO deadlines and wasting time watching the Olympics all the time (seriously–I was watching archery at 2 in the morning last night) to figure out everything else.
All this wedding business made me wonder about the history of the engagement ring. Here are a few tidbits I found while doing some research:
1) The ancient Egyptians and Romans had some form of wedding/betrothal rings. The Egyptians were a single twisted wire of silver or gold, and they were the first to believe the ring should be worn on the 4th finger of the left hand because supposedly a vein led from there to the heart. (Many mummies have been found wearing these rings). The Romans often had a small carved key on their wedding rings–a modern-day romantic might think it is meant to be “the key to the heart” but in reality it probably signified unlocking wealth, or ownership. Wealthy Roman wives might have two rings, a gold one for special/going out days and an iron one for everyday.
2) The first known diamond engagement ring was exchanged between Archduke Maximilian of Austria and Mary of Burgundy in 1477. (for the rest of us they took a few hundred years to catch on). One of the smallest diamond engagement rings on record was exchanged in 1518 between the Dauphin of France and Princess Mary of England. The bride was 2 years old. It didn’t work out.
3) In the Renaissance, “Posie” (promise) rings were popular, gold or silver bands engraved with verses exhorting the beloved to “remember me”. (I have a copy of such a ring that was found in the excavation of the Rose Theater. I always imagine the girl who lost it must have been very upset. Or maybe they had a fight and she threw it away). I read a legend that says in Puritan communities the brides were given a thimble (since rings would be vanity), but they ended up cutting off the tops and wearing the bands as rings anyway.
4) Rubies were very popular in the 18th century. The Victorians, with their love of all things sentimental, loved DEAREST rings (bands set with a diamond, emerald, amethyst, etc). Serpents were also considered good luck; Queen Victoria had a ring with this motif.
5) In 1867, diamond mines were discovered in South Africa. In 1886, Tiffany introduced the “Tiffany setting,” a 6-pring ring that showed off the stone by raising it up off the band. Diamonds really started to take off for engagement rings in the 1920s and ’30s, when places like Sears started carrying them.
6) In 1946, men’s wedding bands became trendy when Humphrey Bogart wore one after his marriage to Lauren Bacall.
In modern times, of course, the choice is endless!
What kind of ring do you like best? Which historical wedding would you like to jump in the time machine and attend?? Whose ring would you steal?
I am in Berkeley Springs, West Virginia, today, finishing up a weekend writing retreat that was incredibly productive. We’re in a vacation rental surrounded by forest and, listening to the birds during the day and the cicadas at night. It has been a lovely consolation for missing RWA.
So…no time for a proper blog today! It’s our last day and there is lots to do before leaving.
Here’s a photo from the restaurant where we ate dinner last night, which gives you an idea of the landscape around here (although it is a lot greener than it looks in this photo).
Where are you today, in your head and in reality?